If you are at this level, my preference would be the Palo Alto system, that allows the administrator to create rules, and abstractions that ultimately lead to an administrator putting together a policy like: "Inbound reverse web proxy" -> "any external system" -> "our reverse proxies" -> "web protocols". Please let me know if i was wrong, I looking if someone more experience can share his view so that i can add to my evaluation list.ĭepending on the size of the company, most enterprise-level firewalls will demonstrate a centralized management console capable of managing many disparate firewall locations, as well as the virtual elements within each. Pros - FTD will be integrate NGFW feature (VPN and multi context still not support yet)
#Fortinet download issues fg200d how to#
Pros - Stable, reliable, good CLI, large user community, good documentation but not so straight forward, more discount if you are Cisco house.Ĭons - Need put more effort to understand how to use, GUI is not so user friendly, security is just a part of their business, a lot console need to take care. Pros - Seldom see in complex deployment but good in office/branch deployment, cheaper, clean GUI, very good integrate with their end point solutions.Ĭons - There are a lot of users feedback that DPI slowdown the internet speed, very little referrer, they might more focus on their end point solutions.Ĭons - Very little referrer, consume more rack space. Pros - Seldom see in complex deployment but good in office/branch deployment, cheaper, clean GUI, user friendly GUI, good documentation some even have video.Ĭons - Due to the Dell acquisition the development has slowdown, they told me they are catching up now, only 1 sale engineer in my country.
#Fortinet download issues fg200d update#
Pros - Reasonable price with performance, purpose build ASIC to provide very high network throughput, very high VPN throughput among the competitor, large community, large knowledge base, complex deployment, good documentation and easy to understand explanation.Ĭons - Got a lot of feedback that there are some issues when update the firmware (Suspect because ASIC chip compatibility with different firmware) Pros - Good in security, pure-play security company, long history, very clean GUI, very user friendly GUI, large community, large knowledge base, complex deployment, good documentation but not so straight forward.Ĭons - Expensive, due to the architecture easily get under size. No perfect solution, if you have budget you can go for carrier grade firewall, is like no one can stop you to buying Ferrari. but actually they have same purpose, the only difference is marketing term like AMP, ATP, Sandblast, Wildfire etc. They (firewall maker) can say they are the leader, they have special ability (*haha), best in the world, etc. Technical spec i won't say much here, it has to depends on your need (feature to turn on), size (office/datacenter/etc) and budget. I'm also evaluating firewall: Checkpoint, Fortigate, Sonicwall, Sophos, Huawei, Cisco ASA, Cisco FirePOWER, Juniper
0 kommentar(er)
